Movie Review: Lord of the Rings

By Alfred G. Packer

DISCLAIMER

MY review of this film is not an endorsement of Hollywood. The movie industry
is run primarily by Jews. (Consider the ticket and snack prices at most theaters.)
Mainstream "cinema" is overwhelmingly anti-White in its messages. Once in a
while, however, something good actually comes out of Hollywood.

A WORTHWHILE MOVIE

Lord of the Rings Part I, The Fellowship of the Ring, opened in theaters nationwide
on Friday, December 21. I saw it with my wife on the 22nd. In our area there were
long lines in the cold and rain for tickets. Fortunately, we had ordered ours
on-line in advance. Every seat in the theater was taken. (Side note: There are
ways to buy your ticket in advance available online in case you want to save
some time standing in line in winter weather. Just do a search for "online movie
ticket purchase.")

RATING

Some activists have claimed that Lord of the Rings is the best seemingly pro-White
movie they've ever seen. I wouldn't go that far, but it's certainly the most
enjoyable and White-friendly film that I've seen this year. I also predict that
it will become a classic among our Folk, much like Excalibur and BRAVEHEART.
I'd give Lord of the Rings a rating of four out of five runes.

THE GOOD GUYS

For starters, Lord of the Rings is the first film in years that features good
guys who are all White. Although some of the protagonists are of mythological
races (elves, hobbits, dwarves), they and the humans all have clearly European
features. Blue eyes, fair skin, blond hair, red hair, and brown hair are some of
the White physical traits that the good guys (and gals) possess. The European
heroes of the film also display honor, courage, wisdom, resourcefulness, strength
of character, a sense of duty, and contempt for weakness.

THE BAD GUYS

In a refreshing twist for Hollywood, all the evil creatures in Lord of the Rings
have dark features. The "ring wraiths" are always cloaked in black; the evil
wizard has dark, beady, Semitic eyes; and the "orcs" (mutant warriors) have black
eyes and dark, slimy skin. This is exactly the opposite of how things are normally
presented in mainstream movies. Most of the time, the overtly White characters are
bad, and the non-Whites are good.

CRITICISM

There were only a few elements of Lord of the Rings that I disliked. One was its
occasional graphic violence. White parents should bear this in mind. I'd recommend
that kids under twelve be encouraged to wait a little while to see this movie. The
film also featured a couple of corny, overly sentimental scenes that seemed to be
thrown in as a cheap way of tugging at the viewer's heartstrings.

PLOT SYNOPSIS

The movie's storyline centers on a very powerful ring that for many years was kept
by a hobbit. The ring is one of a set, and is the most powerful of them
all. The ring has a terrible history of causing greed, lust for power, and madness.
(Sounds like a certain real enemy race we know.) The only way for the ring
and its evil influence to be destroyed is for it to be cast back into the fires
from which it was forged.

Leaders of the noble (White) races form an alliance, and a representative from
each race volunteers to return the ring to its origins. Together, this "fellowship"
must cross enemy territory to make sure the ring is destroyed forever and not stolen.

Various (non-White) villains and monsters confront the (White) fellowship on their
journey, making for some great fight scenes. Personal trials also await the
members of the group. Will the ring be destroyed first, or will the fellowship?

SUMMING UP

Again, Lord of the Rings is pretty much a "must see" for racially conscious
White people. Get your tickets in advance, don't take kids who are too young,
and expect to add this movie to your pro-White collection.