Pro-White Forum Article #43 12/26/01
.
Flight 587 and the Richard Reid Incident

By Dr. Hans von Ohain


The latest attempted attack on a passenger plane involved plastic explosives and Richard Reid, a convert to Islam, who lived in England. Early reports were highly confused suggesting that his passport was fake, and one report claimed that he was from Sri Lanka. The latest description of Reid, according to an Associated Press article is as follows:
 
>London's Times newspaper and a French police
>official both have identified Reid as a British petty
>criminal with an English mother and a Jamaican father
 
Flight 587 has been explained away to the general public as a structural failure due to flaws in the composite tail. In fact, we were all told that it was not a terrorist attack even before the investigation was started. In reality, there is very strong evidence that the destruction of Flight 587 was due to a terrorist attack, and the recent incident with Richard Reid may tell us how the attack was carried out.
 
First of all, the current stories about Flight 587 being fed to the general public are rich in baloney. The official story from the Feds is that the vertical tail fin fell off in flight due to wake turbulence from another airplane over two minutes ahead of it. In order for this to be true, the vertical tail would literally have to be held on by barely a thread. The previous flight of that jet should have experienced some signs that the tail fin was breaking loose if this had been the case. These jets are flying through severe thunderstorms and wind shears on a regular basis. The mild turbulence from a preceding aircraft, that is at the recommended safe separation distance, is completely unimportant. There were actually tests done recently to determine the effect of wake turbulence and wing tip vortices to try to explain another crash a few years ago. The NTSB KNOWS that this is a very minor effect, and yet the Feds are seriously suggesting that it is a probable cause. Also, this particular plane was inspected twice after an incident involving severe turbulence. The structural inspection methods would have to be horribly flawed to fail to notice major cracks in the tail fin. The current structural inspection process is probably still reasonably competent otherwise we would have planes crashing every day, dropping engines off in midair, or collapsing their landing gear when landing. The tail fin realistically would need a major catastrophic event such as an explosion or midair collision to knock it off.
 
The whole argument about how the tail fin broke off is a waste of time. There are several extremely significant factors that completely overshadow the tail fin argument. These additional factors are:
 
1).Eyewitnesses on the ground report hearing an explosion shortly before Flight 587 crashed.
 
2).A videotape shows a "puff of smoke" at the wing-fuselage connection, indicating a likely explosion.
 
3).Both the tail fin AND A WING were found in Jamaica Bay, a body of water near New York. It seems likely that a wing broke off due to an explosion and collided with the tail's rudder. The vertical tail comes in two parts, the non-moving tail fin and the rudder. No pictures of the rudder have been shown to the public.
 
All this evidence was known before the Richard Reid incident. The Reid incident, however, tells us how the explosion on board the plane was probably started. Reid was caught with tennis shoes containing plastic explosives. Most importantly Reid was trying to detonate his shoe-bomb at his seat, which was just over the wing.
 
The wing-fuselage intersection is important since large fuel tanks are contained in the wings. A small amount of plastic explosives may be sufficient to puncture the fuel tanks and ignite the fuel in them. Also, any significant damage done to the wing-fuselage connection part of the plane could potentially cause a wing to fail at that location, completely dooming the airliner. If the initial explosion did not cause the wing to collapse, a resulting fire at the root of the wing may eventually cause a collapse and bring down the plane.
 
If the Feds were serious about investigating Flight 587, they would be examining the seating arrangement to see who was in the seats near the wing on that flight. If a Saudi Arabian "student" or another "convert to Islam" just happened to have a window seat on that plane, this would be overwhelming circumstantial evidence.
 
Basically, the Federal Government is lying to us again. They are afraid that continued attacks on our airlines will result in a major recession if people quit flying for a prolonged amount of time. The Feds are pretending that they are in control of the current situation. Shortly after the September 11th bombing, three additional commercial jets crashed. One was flown out of Israel, and the world was told that the Ukranians "accidentally" shot it down. (I wonder how much the Ukranians had to be paid to take the blame for that incident.) Another plane crashed in Italy, and Flight 587 was the third plane. All three of these crashes have been explained away as "anything, but terrorism."
 
The bottom line is that American support for Israel, which continues to oppress and occasionally murder Moslems, has resulted in the Moslems making us targets for terrorist reprisals. Obviously, we should not be involved in foreign military conflicts, which are really of no concern for America. The Jews control our mass media and politicians. We only hear politicians saying that "Israel is of great importance to America" and "We will never abandon Israel." Well, how many Americans have to die just so that Israel can continue to treat Palestinians like dogs? How long will White Americans tolerate a few rich Jews and a corrupt political system forcing our nation to support the murderous, bandit state of Israel?