Remember when some high school students were ejected from a movie theater for "inappropriate laughter" during a screening of Steven Spielberg's Schindler's List? Apparently, the Jews know that laughter is the best medicine and a good antidote to their propaganda as well. Whites must not, above all else, laugh at any of the sacred cows that the Jews insist that we worship. It breaks the obligatory solemn train of tears and guilt and the whimpering din of "Holocaust survivors."

In recent years the Jews have been shaking down major corporations for billions of dollars in reparations over the Holocaust. A growing mountain of evidence (Ref. 1) has appeared that Jews in Europe during World War Two were treated not much differently than interned Japanese in America. Still, the Jews value the Holocaust as a way to portray Gentiles as monsters, maintain their racial cohesion, suppress criticism of Jews or Israel, shake down corporations and banks for all the imaginary dead Jews and justify the existence of Israel. Perhaps one day, banks and corporations will realize that they should start funneling money to the Institute of Historical Review to fight the Holocaust lie since there is no end in sight to the reparation demands from the Jews. The entire existence of the Jews is so heavily dependent upon the Holocaust that it is no surprise that the Jews fear both exposure and ridicule.

The Jewish Museum of New York is opening an exhibit March 17th titled, "Mirroring Evil: Nazi Imagery/Recent Art," intended to question the "commercialization" of the Holocaust. The display features a concentration camp built of Lego blocks, and shows pictures of poison gas canisters with designer logos emblazoned upon them. Was the Lego block concentration camp built by an aspiring five year old anti-Semite? Perhaps a sign warning against inappropriate laughter anywhere near a Holocaust exhibit is needed.

Menachem Rosensaft, a founder of the International Network of Children of Holocaust Survivors, objects to the display and considers the placement of the warning sign an inadequate gesture. There is no doubt that when Rosensaft's group is one day succeeded by the International Network of Great-Great-Grandchildren of Holocaust Survivors, their slogan will not be "Never Again," but "Never Enough."

Rosensaft does not see any humor in Holocaust Legos and poison gas logos. Were he and his ilk less sensitive, it might be a little less easy for the likes of me to criticize them, because they would project an air of confidence and success. The political fortunes of the Jews might then be a little more secure, but Rosenaft and his type are profoundly humorless.

Rush Limbaugh famously remarked that liberals had no sense of humor. The humorless Hillary Clinton can easily be imagined with a stern look on her face and a rolling pin in hand, should her wandering husband ever come close. Limbaugh and his team of right wing parody artists have turned liberal sacred cows into hamburger on a regular basis. The withering ridicule was so effective that the liberals responded by trying to pass a "Hush Rush" bill through Congress so that a boring hack like Daschle could interrupt Limbaugh every five minutes to respond. The fact that the liberals have failed for fourteen years to produce a radio show as effective as Limbaugh's is a testimony to their lack of talent. More importantly the Jews KNOW there is tremendous talent on the right wing, and they are afraid that a pro-White talk show may appear and ridicule them on a daily basis.

William Sargent points out in "Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of Conversion and Brainwashing" (Cambridge, MA: Malor Books, 1957/1997) that the animal conditioning techniques developed by the Russian scientist Pavlov are applicable to human religious and political manipulation and conversion. In a nutshell, Sargent suggests that the unrelenting application of a stressor such as fear, anger, or excitement wears down a subject, leading to heightened suggestibility. Part of this process of creating tension in a subject includes inducing guilt and a conflict of loyalties. Once the subject has "broken down," it is possible to re-shape his basic belief system by providing a possibility of salvation from the building tension, or an "escape route." Sargent describes how preachers and even police interrogators use pressure techniques to "crack" a subject and gain a conversion or confession. Sargent doesn't mention this, but the Jews also use the technique. The Jews cultivate guilt over the Holocaust, and they "charge" terms like "racist" and "bigot" with fear and shame, and then affix these labels to their opponents.

It is possible to resist these pressure techniques. Sargent recommends mentally concentrating on something other than what the preacher or interrogator wants you to. You should ignore the interrogator, and not cooperate or participate in any fashion. Some in our Movement have recommended this strategy as The Five Words: "I have nothing to say."

Finally, you can rely on the deep power of humor. Sargent writes, "The safety of the free world seems&to lie in a cultivation not only of courage, moral virtue and logic, but of humor: humor which produces the well-balanced state in which emotional excess is laughed at as ugly and wasteful." This is why the laughing teen was ejected from the theater during Schindler's List, and why the Rosensafts of the world object to absurd Holocaust displays. This is one of the secrets to defeating Jewish power: Laugh at them. Refuse to participate in the massive guilt trip the Jews lay on society. Laugh off Jewish attempts to scare you with words like "bigot" and "racist." You'll help further the cause of White Nationalism and have a lot of fun along the way as well.

1).Institute for Historical Review
http://www.ihr.org