The recent American Renaissance conference has attracted "mainstream" media attention and revealed some potential pitfalls the White Nationalist movement would do well to avoid. As some friendly critics of Jared Taylor's approach point out, one of these traps is the tendency to succumb to "Semitical Correctness," including the encouragement of Jewish participation in our Movement. There are sound philosophical and practical reasons for resisting the urge to put the Jewish Question on the back burner.

It is insanity to allow Jews into a political organization, whose goal is to overthrow a corrupt tyranny that was created by the Jews and is still controlled by the Jews. While it may be true that a few Jews genuinely want to expel Third World races from America, there are critical flaws in any plan to join forces with the Jews. If the Jews are allowed to stay in America, but are only removed from power, they will eventually persuade weak-minded moderates to repeal any restrictions that keep them out of politics and enslave America all over again.

Jews have a tendency to take over any political organization that allows them to join. The pathetic state of the Republican Party and its complete failure to control immigration are powerful reasons not to accept Jews. A pro-White organization that allowed Jews would ultimately become another "Republican Party." An additional critical problem is that Jews have always used spies. Many Christians have wondered why Judas was allowed to be a disciple. Jesus knew that Judas would betray him and prophesied his betrayal. The events surrounding Jesus Christ are a warning from God to beware of the evil works of the Jews. The disciple Judas was chosen to give us a clear example and warning to beware of Jewish spies acting as our friends.

White Nationalists are given to the human urge to seek the path of least resistance, as much as their ideology specifically condemns such a move in the name of upward racial progress. Some may be frustrated with our apparent slowness in gaining traction and making political progress. These souls may view cooperation with the Jews, who come ready-made by ties of blood with a conduit to influence, as a quick-fix or shortcut to political power for White Nationalists. Patience, however, remains a virtue with which we best reacquaint ourselves. The desperate are prone to err, and the continued existence of White Americans as a unique and identifiable people is at stake.

Newhouse News Service, a fount of the usual Semitic swill which seeps into the American body politic, ran an article titled "Brighter White Nationalists May Emerge From Shadows" under Jonathan Tilove's byline. The subject: the 2002 American Renaissance conference, which hosted a clientele that clearly and publicly refutes the "ignorant, low-IQ hateful bigot" image of White Nationalism the media has long promoted. A string of books on White Nationalism will soon come into print, Tilove notes. He quotes a number of Establishment lackeys who suggest the Movement is gaining influence, addressing White concerns that have long gone unanswered, and who even believe that our arguments are legitimate in an age in which Whites have been rendered a despised minority by official policy.

That article is great cause for hope, because it shows that our Movement has graduated to the level where it is now a true threat to ZOG. We have forced the Jews, long accustomed to ignoring or belittling us, to the point where they now seek to contain and, if necessary, appease us. This is a great historical milestone, for the Jews have just set their course for oblivion. Their defensive concession of ground is precisely what destroyed the conservative movement and the GOP in the United States.

The Newhouse article, however, gives great cause for concern. We have all heard the saying, "If it looks too good to be true, it probably is." Why then, do we not apply this cautious wisdom when Newhouse News does a virtual showcasing of American Renaissance? If we did remain skeptical, the other side of the "contain and appease" coin the Jews just handed us would be apparent: the possibility of co-option. The Jews may "befriend" us, join our Movement while giving their NAACP stooges the heave-ho, and then conveniently squelch discussion of the Jewish Question to save their own skins and maintain their parasitic hold over the United States.

The Steinlight piece suggests that the current immigration level is bad for U.S. Jews as it swamps the political playing field and disrupts their influence. Steinlight's article has crossed many a desk in the Movement and indicates that the Jews may be planning this back-up strategy for the future. This recent Newhouse piece on the AR conference fits the pattern and confirms this suspicion.

The Jews are masters at thinking several moves ahead. We must do the same if our Movement is to avoid being co-opted in the future. We must not allow organizations such as American Renaissance to become the new "neo-cons" of the White Nationalist movement, in which Jews hijack the movement and render it inert in the same way they stole conservatism in the 1970s. White Nationalism five, ten, or fifteen years from now must not degenerate into another fake opposition to the multiracial Left, in the manner that the current Republican Party lulls middle Americans to sleep.

For the moment, the issues raised here are academic, because the movement as a whole is not yet at the point where Jews actively court it in significant numbers. One day, though, the savvy denizens of the Middle Eastern bazaars will expect the goyim to accept the first offer they make. Instead, we must accept no "deals" that serve the interests of the Jews, for their interests and ours are permanently irreconcilable and incompatible, due to evolutionary genetics and a long, painful cultural and social history. We can never lower our guard, so keep the points made here in mind for the long-term. Treat this article much as you would the trusty red fire alarm panel on the wall. Don't let the mistakes of the past become the mistakes of the future.