News broke on Thursday that Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was executed by his Pakistani captors. The media was all over the story, labeling it “An act of barbarism” and expressing all kinds of sympathy for Pearl. It was pointed out several times that Pearl was targeted because he was Jewish, and pictures were shown repeatedly of Pearl’s wife, seven months pregnant, designed to put a lump in the throat of the viewers and conjure up enormous amounts of empathy for the woman and her unborn child.

When is this kind of attention devoted to any of the Palestinian victims of similar “acts of barbarism” by the Israeli military? Palestinians are denied basic human rights, driven from their homes, arrested without evidence and murdered without reason on an almost daily basis in Israel and there is never any sympathy or emotional newscasts on their behalf. The fact that some young Palestinian saw no reason to live in Israel and volunteered to blow himself up is never seriously discussed. When a suicide bomber blows himself up and kills or wounds a few Israelis, we see bloody bodies, crying children and pandemonium in the streets, all designed to strike an emotional chord with the viewers and bolster support for Israel.

Compare that news coverage to the news reports of Israeli “Reprisals”, which are delivered similar to the newscasts of our military operations in Afghanistan. The report always takes the form: “Israeli forces responded to Palestinian terrorism today by firing missiles at a suspected terrorist meeting place and by bombing a factory suspected of building bombs which are used to kill Israeli civilians. 6 suspected militants were killed and 11 wounded. Today’s attacks were in response to yesterday's ambush in the West Bank, which wounded two Israeli soldiers.” Have you ever heard of an attack by Palestinians referred to as a reprisal?

Notice how Israelis always “respond to terrorism” whenever they attack Palestinians, but when Palestinians respond to the illegal occupation of their homeland, it is “terrorism.” These semantics are very helpful in convincing American viewers that Israel is fair and just, and it is the "evil" Palestinians who must be stopped.

Imagine what would happen if several Arabs were arrested for planning to blow up the office of a Jewish congressman and a synagogue. The media coverage of such an event would include: front page headlines, in-depth hour long exposes on the news magazine shows, interviews with the officers who stopped the terrorist attack, possibly even a Time magazine cover. Later, we would receive updates on the arraignments, indictments and trials of the Arab terrorists. Court TV would no doubt lobby for the privilege of televising the trial. It is unlikely anyone would believe an event like this would not receive massive media attention.

Why then, has the media been almost completely silent about an almost identical event? An actual event happened last December that was almost EXACTLY the same, the only difference between the above hypothetical case and the actual case was that the ethnicities of the parties involved were reversed. Members of the Jewish Defense League were arrested for plotting to blow up the office of an Arab-American member of Congress and a mosque. (Ref. 1) CNN reported that "Federal authorities charged Rubin and Krugel on December 12 with conspiring to blow up Arab and Muslim institutions in southern California, including the offices of Arab-American congressman Rep. Darrell Issa."

This event was covered briefly when the arrest happened and was mentioned on the evening newscasts that night briefly, right before a commercial break, and appeared in the next day’s newspaper several pages back, with only half a paragraph. There has been only sparse coverage at best of this event since the initial brief coverage. How can anyone watch carefully controlled coverage like this and not see a Jewish bias? How can it be called "anti-Semitic" to point out the truth about Jewish media bias and Jewish media ownership? How much of the truth should be labeled anti-Semitic?

We have seen the media continue to smear anyone who dares to point out these things. Anytime David Duke is mentioned in the press the words “former Ku Klux Klansman” always precede his name. This is an obvious attempt to discredit every point David Duke makes. The Jewish media never mentions the fact that Duke has a long history of peaceful activism. We have seen this bias in the media coverage of the racially motivated beatings in Virginia. Duke's affiliation with completely legal organizations in the 1970s is more important to the Jewish media than a string of brutal, racially-motivated attacks by Blacks against Whites in present-day America.

Now we are supposed to be saddened by the death of a Jewish reporter, who reports for a Zionist newspaper and who traveled into hostile territory without regard for his mulatto wife or his unborn child. We are supposed to be outraged that the kidnappers targeted Pearl because he was Jewish, while we ignore the thousands of Palestinians who are targeted by Jews because of their race. We are supposed to respect our American media, and appreciate the risks they take to bring us their “fair and balanced” news. And we are supposed to pretend our media is not controlled by who controls it and not owned by who owns it.

We don't have to listen to the Jewish media anymore. We can begin to get our news from Internet news sites, sympathetic to the White race, which have the ability to present the news just as completely as the television and print media without the Jewish bias. Visit www.whitecivilrights.com, EANNEWS.COM. ,rense, or any of the many others for news and commentaries on breaking news, and stop wasting time with the Jewish media outlets that have long ago shown their disregard for White people and White causes.

Jewish author Bernard Goldberg has written a bestseller titled "Bias." In typical Jewish fashion, he has completely ignored Jewish bias, as if it doesn't exist, and focused solely on liberal bias. A much better book on media bias, which has not received any attention in the media (because its author isn’t Jewish) is "Coloring the News" by William McGowan. This book gives a much better analysis of media bias, including politically incorrect topics such as how the media "mistold" the Proposition 209 story in California and ongoing problems with "Gays in the military."

Thankfully many Americans have grown sick of media bias. The ultra-liberal CNN has been recently surpassed by Fox Cable News. It is only a matter of time before White Americans decide that they want pro-White news sources that deliver the news honestly and without the usual Jewish bias. Thankfully the Internet is making this possible and the liberal networks will only grow smaller with time until they permanently lose the average White American demographic permanently.

1).JDL chairman denied bail in alleged plot to blow up mosque
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/01/29/jdl.bomb.charges/index.html