Considerable research work has been done linking brain size to intelligence and documenting the fact that the races have different brain sizes. One brave researcher in this politically incorrect field is Professor J. Philippe Rushton, who wrote an excellent paper in 1996 entitled "RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE REVISED EDITION OF S. J. GOULD'S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN." The title of his paper reveals an interesting controversy. There are in fact people working hard to suppress the truth in this field, who throw out arguments like a man throwing darts with a blindfold on, hoping one of them will hit the target.

There are basically three types of individuals, who fight against honest studies of racial intelligence. The most obvious opponents are non-Whites, who don't want their races identified as being less intelligent than the White race. The next opponents are bleeding heart liberals, who don't think it's "fair" that the races are different. So, based on this "feeling," they decide that all scientific data that proves the races are different "must be wrong." The most organized and virulent opponents of anyone scientifically proving that the races are unequal are the Jews. The Jews deep down know that they are an alien race with a large number of liberal academics, lawyers, and other parasites among their population. The Jews secretly despise Christianity and favor homosexuality and racial diversity, beliefs strongly at odds with the beliefs of most White people. The Jews know that the best intellectuals of the White race are 100 percent opposed to their views. The Jews cultivate pale-faced vermin like the Clintons and the Kennedy's to be their puppets as they stay behind the scenes as wire-pullers. The Jews then become the biggest supporters of massive immigration of Third World races into America so that attention is drawn away from themselves as the Blacks and Mexicans create much more obvious racial problems. The Jews push the racial equality theory, knowing it is false, as a cover for their more insidious efforts to corrupt our government and change the racial make up of America.

The study of man's evolution shows that, over millions of years, a series of hominids evolved, who started with relatively small-sized brains of 400 cc and who eventually evolved into the modern races with the Europeans having an average brain size of 1,500 cc. If brain size were unimportant, why did it increase from 400 cc to 1500cc over the last several million years? Why don't ancient hominids have 1,500 cc brains? Why do apes have brains in the 400 cc range today? An open-minded person can only conclude that the increasing brain size was a hallmark of evolution.

Liberals and Jews basically throw everything, but the kitchen sink at you if you try to debate the issue of race, intelligence, and brain size. Most of them are too dishonest to even admit that brain size and intelligence are linked ...probably because they know that if they concede that point, what comes next is proof of racial inequality.

Many liberals desperately grab onto the fact that whales and elephants have larger brains than humans while one species of dolphins have roughly the same size brains as humans. Considering that elephants can weigh over 10,000 lbs. and that certain whales can weigh over 50,000 lbs, their larger brains are explained by the need for a certain amount of gray matter for muscle control. (A dolphin weighs about two and a half times as much as an average person so its equal sized brain falls short after allowing for its larger size.) If you assume that most of an elephant's brain is devoted to muscle control, then about 0.65 cc of gray matter are needed for each pound of elephant. If you assume a similar ratio for people, then only about 100 cc of gray matter out of 1500 cc total are needed for muscle control for a human. Our relatively small body size means that over 90 percent of our brains are available for rational thought. After allowing for body size, the liberal argument about whales and elephants, falls apart, and humans have the largest brains capable of rational thought.

Professor Rushton cites one study that involved a large number of White and Black children:

Further, the brain-size/IQ correlation is predictive from birth.
The National Collaborative Perinatal Study analyzed data
from 17,000 White babies and 19,000 Black babies followed
from birth to 7 years (Broman et al., 1987). Head perimeters
were measured at birth for all children. At age 7, head perimeters
were remeasured and IQ assessed. For both the Black and the
White children, head perimeter measured at birth significantly
predicted head perimeter at 7 years, and head perimeter at both
ages predicted IQ!